Merck Called a 'Monster,' Then Jury Gets the Case
The Record, Bergen County, NJ › November 02, 2005
Linked as:
The Record, Bergen County, NJ › November 02, 2005
Linked as:Summary
ATLANTIC CITY - A Superior Court jury hearing a Vioxx product liability case brought by a postal worker against the drug maker Merck & Co. deliberated about an hour Tuesday without reaching a verdict and was then sent home for the night after getting the case earlier in the day.
The six-woman, three-man panel will try again today to decide whether Merck knowingly misrepresented the safety risks posed by its blockbuster arthritis drug and whether Vioxx contributed to Frederick "Mike" Humeston's heart attack.See the full content of this document
Extract
Merck Called a 'Monster,' Then Jury Gets the Case
In a closing argument Tuesday, Humeston attorney Chris Seeger called Merck a "monster" and compared its defense in the seven-week trial to an octopus that squirts ink ...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Valley Forge Museum Gets Backing From Park Service | men s basketball | clendenin troupe to present doc s holiday comedy is eighth production of first baptist ch... | Track and Field | Decisión nº 376I-140605 de Juzgado Segundo de Primera Instancia en lo Civil, Mercantil y Agrario de Carabobo (Extensión Valencia), de June 14, 2005 | Decisión nº PJ00920080000210 de Tribunal Noveno de Primera Instancia de Sustanciación, Mediación y Ejecución del Trabajo de Carabob... | Sentencia nº 141910 de Corte de Apelaciones de Santiago Sala Primera June 22 2011 | decisión de juzgado superior sexto en lo civil y contencioso administrativo. de caracas, de february 11, 2009