Don't Take a Vacation From Portfolio Reviews
The Record, Bergen County, NJ › May 02, 2006
Linked as:
The Record, Bergen County, NJ › May 02, 2006
Linked as:Summary
Our dumbest investment was Pan Am Airlines back in early 1991. Shares were priced quite low because there were problems. I didn't know anything about investing at the time and was in law school. After I took my bar exam, my husband and I went on vacation. We had no way to track the stock while we were gone, nor thought that we needed to. On our return, we learned Pan Am had gone into bankruptcy and the stock had tanked. Being bullish by nature, we hung on and ultimately called it a loss on our tax return a few years ago. I learned a great lesson: Review your portfolio before any extended vacations and, if the company is shaky, put in automatic sell orders if it drops below a certain point. Neva Strom, New York
The Fool Responds: It's a good idea to review your portfolio every few months, or at least twice a year, whether you're vacationing or not. Check news reports and quarterly earnings reports for any red flags, such as slowing growth or increasing competition.See the full content of this document
Extract
Don't Take a Vacation From Portfolio Reviews
, ...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Yankees Notes | Dot Wants Seat Belts in Motorcoaches | 2011 medicare payment update for post-acute care providers | Ruth Marcus Give the First Lady a Break | Decisione del Consiglio, del 17 aprile 2000, recante nomina di un membro titolare e di due supplenti belgi del Comitato delle r... | Sentencia de Conseil d Etat January 05 1972 caso Conseil d Etat 5 / 3 SSR du 5 janvier 1972 78436 | sentencia de conseil d'etat, april 30, 2004 (caso conseil d'etat, 5ème et 4ème sous-sections réunies, du 30 avril 2004, 24... | Sentencia de Cours d'appel, March 20, 2006 (caso Cour d'appel de Grenoble, CT0044, du 20 mars 2006)