Bass-Playing Lawyer Defeats Guitar Giant ; Hackensack Firm Prevails Against Fender's Claim to Design Rights
The Record, Bergen County, NJ › April 22, 2009
Linked as:
The Record, Bergen County, NJ › April 22, 2009
Linked as:Summary
Ron Bienstock is a lawyer and a rock musician who combined those two parts of his life to gain what is perhaps the biggest legal victory of his career.
The 50-something attorney from Fair Lawn, who fills his nights and weekends with the passions of a 20-something musician, took on one of the music industry's biggest players and won, persuading the U.S. Trademark and Appeal Board to deny a bid by Fender Musical Instruments Corp., or FMIC, to monopolize guitar designs.See the full content of this document
Extract
Bass-Playing Lawyer Defeats Guitar Giant ; Hackensack Firm Prevails Against Fender's Claim to Design Rights
The hotly contested case stretched on for six years, but in the end, the trademark board ruled that the body shapes that Fender attempted to register as trademarks were generic, and open to use by all guitar and b...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
maricopa s task upgrading its 21-year-old legacy system with hp knowing where the legacies are buried is key to this enterprise-wide upgrade. | David Croheim Mortgage Corporation arranged a $3.16 million loan for a retail center in Springfield N.J. | Stock Market Ratings by StockPickReport.com for Standard & Poors, Tyco Internatio... | IDT Interprise Integrated Communications Processor Named AnalogZONE Product of the Year RC32438 Processor Reco... | decisión nº 093-04 de corte de apelaciones sala 3 de zulia de march 26 2004 | Decisión nº 1C642-04 de Tribunal Primero de Control del L.O.P.N.A. Area Penal Extensión Barlovento de Miranda, de March 22, 2004 | decisión nº wj01-s-2002-001828 de juzgado segundo de control de vargas de march 03 2004 | Sentencia nº 2253 de Consiglio di Stato, May 06, 2009